Part of: The 'Breach of Trust' surveillance hearing & the silhouette photo (May 20, 2025) · The 'PREDATORS' poster outside her office (Feb.-Nov. 2025) · Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Musgrave v. Mace (2:25-cv-01823-RMG) · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
At her own surveillance hearing, Mace displays a 'naked silhouette' of herself: 'That's my body. You can see the silhouette.'
Chairing a House Oversight subcommittee hearing she titled 'Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces,' Rep. Nancy Mace held up a poster-sized image she said depicted her own body, told the room it had been captured by hidden surveillance without her consent, and said no one had been arrested. She tied the image to her ex-fiancé, Patrick Bryant, who categorically denies her allegations; the matter is contested and in ongoing litigation.

On May 20, 2025, Rep. Nancy Mace, chairing a House Oversight subcommittee hearing she had titled "Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces", held up a poster-sized image she said depicted her own body and told the hearing room it had been captured by hidden surveillance without her consent.
The Daily Beast's Sarah Ewall-Wice reported that Mace brought the display to the hearing as she accused her ex-fiancé, Charleston businessman Patrick Bryant, and others of recording women without permission; ABC News 4 in Charleston covered the same moment.
Mace at the hearing she chaired, beside the poster-sized surveillance still she displayed on the board, the circled figure she told the room was her own "silhouette." Frame from the U.S. House Oversight Committee's official hearing livestream. Watch the full hearing →
Describing the image on the official record, Mace said:
"I had an oversight about surveillance in private spaces, and that's my body. You can see the silhouette. It's, I mean, it's pretty tame. It's the silhouette. You can tell that it's me and my long hair and everything."
She described the footage as showing women, herself among them, who were "recorded on this camera without their knowledge, without their permission, without their consent," and said that despite coming forward, no one had been held to account:
"today, a year and a half later, since I came forward to law enforcement with all this evidence … no one's been arrested."
Mace told the subcommittee she had also displayed other images she attributed to Bryant:
"I found evidence going back a decade of upskirt photos. And I showed some of those in this hearing."
She framed her own role in the underlying dispute as that of a witness: "I'm a key witness in an investigation. I'm a key witness in a now a civil suit."
Bryant categorically denies Mace's allegations, and the other men she has named deny wrongdoing. No related criminal charges have been filed; the underlying accusations are contested and unproven. Bryant issued a same-day public denial of her claims. Related civil litigation, including Musgrave v. Mace, and a South Carolina State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) investigation remain pending; nothing here is a finding of fact. See People in the Public Record.
Sources & related coverage
- Full hearing, U.S. House Oversight Committee (YouTube)
- Nancy Mace Parades Her Own Naked Photos in Bizarre Hearing, The Daily Beast (Sarah Ewall-Wice)
- Rep. Mace shares alleged nonconsensual naked photo of herself during House hearing, ABC News 4
- Hearing on Surveillance Technology in Short-Term Rentals, House Oversight Subcommittee
- The hearing in the media catalog: Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces · The Daily Beast write-up


Read next
June 30, 2026 · DispatchWas this the voyeurism Nancy Mace was talking about?
Nancy Mace posted that voyeurism is a real issue. The clearest test of what she means is her own May 20, 2025 House Oversight hearing, which she titled 'Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces,' where she held up a poster-sized still she said showed her own body and called it nonconsensual hidden surveillance. Maceopedia asks the narrower public-record question her hearing never answered: was that a hidden camera in a private space, or footage from a room with open windows facing a public or shared space? The two are not the same factual claim, and voyeurism turns on the difference.
June 28, 2026 · DispatchIn an X thread, Mace says the amount should be higher. The public-record receipt says the earlier number was tied to photos.
After Maceopedia resurfaced the Berg-call line about '150K each,' Rep. Nancy Mace replied that the amount 'should be more' and connected the thread to 'what was done to me and others.' The public-record receipt matters because the recorded call discusses a civil lawsuit, photos, and money, not an adjudicated criminal finding.
June 7, 2026 · DispatchOn her first recorded call with Ali Berg, Mace lays out a civil suit against Patrick Bryant: 'He can sell a building or two, settle, be done' and accusers 'can get 150 K each'
FITSNews published the full audio of Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace asks the call stay 'private,' spends little time on the alleged assault or the man she names as the assailant, never offers a victim advocate or a referral to law enforcement, and instead pitches a civil lawsuit against her ex-fiancé Patrick Bryant, predicting he will 'sell a building or two, settle,' and that accusers could 'get 150 K each.'
June 7, 2026 · Dispatch"You have to hit him in his pocketbook with a civil suit": the first recorded call with Ali Berg, in her own words
A produced supercut of Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg (April 6, 2024), published by FITSNews on June 7, 2026, after the recording was produced in ADW v. Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace pitched a civil lawsuit and a payout, never mentioned the police, and never offered Berg a victim advocate or counselor.
December 19, 2025 · DispatchIn her own sworn Answer, Mace admits she 'placed an air tag on Bryant's car for one day in August 2023'
In her December 19, 2025 Answer to Patrick Bryant's Third-Party Complaint, Rep. Nancy Mace admits under oath that she placed a tracking device on Bryant's car and attempted to access his laptop, while denying Bryant's allegation that she intended to weaponize what she found. The filing is Mace's own account, in her own words, on the public court record.
December 1, 2025 · DispatchWhile under the gag order, Mace's congressional office sends a mass newsletter about the case: 'I WILL NOT be silenced.'
On December 1, 2025, while the Berg v. Bryant gag order was in effect, a mass email newsletter from Rep. Nancy Mace's congressional office, headlined 'Rep. Nancy Mace says 2 more women accuse her ex-fiancé of abuse,' named Patrick Bryant, recited unproven allegations, and declared 'I WILL NOT be silenced.' Bryant and Bowman's January 12, 2026 contempt motion attaches the newsletter as Exhibit 8, contending it violated the gag order.
