Dispatches
- September 5, 2026 · Dispatch
"262 times in 36 hours": Mace's X habit becomes the story
On November 20, 2024, former Mace communications director Natalie Johnson called out the sheer volume of Nancy Mace's X posts about the Capitol bathroom fight, writing that Mace had tweeted 262 times in 36 hours about a bill aimed at one incoming member of Congress. The post became a clean public marker for a broader pattern: X posts flagged for hateful conduct, official-account replies aimed at private citizens, and later disputed reporting that former staffers were told to use burner accounts to boost her online.
- June 30, 2026 · Dispatch
Was this the voyeurism Nancy Mace was talking about?
Nancy Mace posted that voyeurism is a real issue. The clearest test of what she means is her own May 20, 2025 House Oversight hearing, which she titled 'Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces,' where she held up a poster-sized still she said showed her own body and called it nonconsensual hidden surveillance. Maceopedia asks the narrower public-record question her hearing never answered: was that a hidden camera in a private space, or footage from a room with open windows facing a public or shared space? The two are not the same factual claim, and voyeurism turns on the difference.
- June 28, 2026 · Dispatch
In an X thread, Mace says the amount should be higher. The public-record receipt says the earlier number was tied to photos.
After Maceopedia resurfaced the Berg-call line about '150K each,' Rep. Nancy Mace replied that the amount 'should be more' and connected the thread to 'what was done to me and others.' The public-record receipt matters because the recorded call discusses a civil lawsuit, photos, and money, not an adjudicated criminal finding.