Part of: The hacking allegation: 'I hacked into his computer and phone' · Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
A sworn affidavit attributes a statement to Mace: 'I hacked into his [Patrick's] computer and phone'
A sworn affidavit by South Carolina journalist Ashleigh Messervy attests that at a private August 28, 2024 meeting, Rep. Nancy Mace, after explaining she 'used to be a programmer', told her: 'I hacked into his [Patrick's] computer and phone.'

A six-page sworn affidavit by South Carolina journalist Ashleigh Messervy appears in full on her page. At its center is a single sentence Messervy attests Rep. Nancy Mace said to her, in person, at a restaurant on Daniel Island on August 28, 2024:
"I hacked into his [Patrick's] computer and phone."
According to the affidavit, Mace prefaced the statement by explaining that she "used to be a 'programmer,'" and produced an envelope of photographs she said she had taken from Bryant's phone, flashing the images and "quickly" returning each to the envelope. Messervy, who dated Bryant before his relationship with Mace, swears Mace declined to name any alleged victim or witness who could corroborate the claims she made at the meeting.
Page 2 of the affidavit, the paragraph containing the statement (¶9), as filed:
In paragraphs that follow, Messervy attests that Mace said any evidence she had gathered had been turned over to the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), and that of the photographs Mace showed her, "none of these women are identifiable in the photos." Messervy also reproduces text messages she says Mace sent her after the meeting, including what Messervy attests was Mace's reply when Messervy asked how she could be sure of the alleged rape allegations Messervy says Mace was making against Bryant, allegations that are unproven and that Bryant has categorically denied:
"Because they recorded it and I found the recordings … allegedly …"
Messervy states she gave an oral statement to SLED on November 13, 2024, and signed the affidavit under penalty of contempt before a South Carolina notary on June 30, 2025.
The allegations Mace describes in the affidavit are unproven and contested, and the matters remain the subject of ongoing civil litigation and a SLED investigation. Rep. Mace has denied wrongdoing and maintains her conduct was undertaken in her official capacity as a Member of Congress; the scope-of-employment question is contested and unadjudicated. Patrick Bryant has categorically denied the underlying claims. Nothing here is a finding of fact. One paragraph of the affidavit, concerning a minor child, has been redacted.
Source: Sworn Affidavit of Ashleigh Messervy (June 30, 2025, redacted, PDF, 6 pages) · Ashleigh Messervy · produced in discovery in GLT2, LLC v. Jane Doe and John Doe (No. 2025-CP-10-00981, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas) and referenced in publicly filed briefing in Musgrave v. Mace (D.S.C., No. 2:25-cv-01823-RMG).
![A sworn affidavit attributes a statement to Mace: 'I hacked into his [Patrick's] computer and phone': image 1](/images/dispatches/card-messervy-hacked-computer-phone.png)
Read next
June 7, 2026 · DispatchOn her first recorded call with Ali Berg, Mace lays out a civil suit against Patrick Bryant: 'He can sell a building or two, settle, be done' and accusers 'can get 150 K each'
FITSNews published the full audio of Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace asks the call stay 'private,' spends little time on the alleged assault or the man she names as the assailant, never offers a victim advocate or a referral to law enforcement, and instead pitches a civil lawsuit against her ex-fiancé Patrick Bryant, predicting he will 'sell a building or two, settle,' and that accusers could 'get 150 K each.'
June 7, 2026 · Dispatch"You have to hit him in his pocketbook with a civil suit": the first recorded call with Ali Berg, in her own words
A produced supercut of Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg (April 6, 2024), published by FITSNews on June 7, 2026, after the recording was produced in ADW v. Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace pitched a civil lawsuit and a payout, never mentioned the police, and never offered Berg a victim advocate or counselor.
- April 6, 2024 · Dispatch
The first recorded call with Ali Berg, April 6, 2024: full supercut, in her own words
A produced vertical supercut of Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Alexis "Ali" Berg (April 6, 2024), published by FITSNews on June 7, 2026, after the recording was produced in ADW v. Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace pitches a civil lawsuit and a payout, never mentions the police, and never offers Berg a victim advocate or counselor.
- April 6, 2024 · Dispatch
Easily all of us can get $150,000 each: the money line from Mace's first call with Ali Berg
A 19-second vertical clip of the money line from Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Alexis "Ali" Berg, April 6, 2024. Rather than a referral to law enforcement or a victim advocate, Mace pitches a civil lawsuit against her ex-fiance Patrick Bryant and tells Berg a payout of about $150,000 each is realistic. FITSNews published the full audio on June 7, 2026, reporting the recording was produced in the ADW v. Berg civil litigation. Mace's allegations on the call are unproven and contested; the people she names deny wrongdoing.
June 30, 2026 · DispatchWas this the voyeurism Nancy Mace was talking about?
Nancy Mace posted that voyeurism is a real issue. The clearest test of what she means is her own May 20, 2025 House Oversight hearing, which she titled 'Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces,' where she held up a poster-sized still she said showed her own body and called it nonconsensual hidden surveillance. Maceopedia asks the narrower public-record question her hearing never answered: was that a hidden camera in a private space, or footage from a room with open windows facing a public or shared space? The two are not the same factual claim, and voyeurism turns on the difference.
June 28, 2026 · DispatchIn an X thread, Mace says the amount should be higher. The public-record receipt says the earlier number was tied to photos.
After Maceopedia resurfaced the Berg-call line about '150K each,' Rep. Nancy Mace replied that the amount 'should be more' and connected the thread to 'what was done to me and others.' The public-record receipt matters because the recorded call discusses a civil lawsuit, photos, and money, not an adjudicated criminal finding.
![Page 2 of the sworn affidavit of Ashleigh Messervy, paragraph 9, in which she attests Nancy Mace said, "I hacked into his [Patrick's] computer and phone"](/images/filings/affidavit-ashleigh-messervy-p2.png)