Part of: Mace Federal Removal (Berg v. Bryant → D.S.C.) · Berg v. Bryant (and Bryant's Third-Party Complaint against Mace) · Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Musgrave v. Mace (2:25-cv-01823-RMG) · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
Ex-fiancé sues Rep. Nancy Mace, claims she fabricated sexual assault allegations
Local Charleston television station Live 5 News was the first outlet to publish Bryant's lawsuit against Mace alleging she fabricated sexual assault claims. All allegations are contested; Mace denied Bryant's account; litigation is active.
Thomas Gruel ·

"It's almost as if Patrick Bryant is asking to write me another check. I just got him sanctioned in court.", Rep. Nancy Mace, statement to Live 5 News
Live 5 News reporter Thomas Gruel was the first journalist to publish on November 6, 2025, when Patrick Bryant, Mace's ex-fiancé, filed a lawsuit accusing her of fabricating sexual assault allegations against him. The station provided the initial local market coverage of what would become a significant legal development in the tangled civil litigation between the two parties.
According to Live 5 News, Bryant's complaint denies the underlying allegations against him. As Gruel reported, the filing states that Bryant and the other men named in it deny having done anything to the person identified in the litigation by the pseudonym "Doe" in October 2018:
"Bryant claims he and other men never did anything to Doe in October 2018 after she fell into a pool at a party.", Live 5 News
The underlying sexual-assault allegations are contested and unproven, and Bryant denies them; the sentence above reports his denial as stated in the complaint, not an established fact.
Bryant's complaint alleged that Mace's public accusations, made in congressional hearings, floor speeches, and media appearances, were fabricated for personal and political gain rather than rooted in genuine claims. Mace denied Bryant's account entirely, and her response framed the filing as an attempt to extract money from her, referencing a prior sanctions ruling.
All allegations in Bryant's complaint are contested and unproven. Mace denies fabricating any claims. Bryant denies all underlying sexual assault allegations. Litigation between the parties and related defendants remains active in South Carolina courts.
Related coverage

Read next
June 7, 2026 · DispatchLeaked Call Details Origins of Nancy Mace's 'Scorched Earth' Campaign
FITSNews obtained a recording of an approximately 45-minute call between Mace and Alexis 'Ali' Berg, the woman whose allegations became central to Mace's public campaign against her former fiancé Patrick Bryant; raising questions about how the allegations evolved from a private conversation into a national political narrative.
January 27, 2026 · DispatchCivil Case Tied to Nancy Mace Careens Deeper Into Chaos
Judge Hocker ordered materials subpoenaed by plaintiff Alexis Berg's attorneys turned over to the court for private review, as dueling emergency motions clashed over whether materials Mace voluntarily shared in June 2025 could be used in litigation, with Mace, now representing herself, filing an 82-page emergency motion to reclaim them as privileged.
January 22, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace: 'I WILL NOT BE SILENCED'
Mace filed a five-page letter attacking Judge Hocker as running a 'kangaroo court,' fired her attorneys, announced plans to represent herself, and declared she would not comply with the gag order, while simultaneously seeking removal of the case to federal court.
January 19, 2026 · DispatchSanctions Showdown: New Filing Accuses Nancy Mace's Lawyers of Fabricating Legal Citations
Patrick Bryant filed a motion seeking Rule 11 sanctions after Mace's attorneys allegedly submitted fabricated case citations and false quotations in a court memorandum, then distributed an 'amended' version without disclosing the original errors, with the filing suggesting AI-generated legal research as a possible explanation.
January 13, 2026 · DispatchGag Order Showdown: New Motion Targets Nancy Mace
Attorneys for Patrick Bryant and Eric Bowman filed a contempt motion seeking civil sanctions, and possible incarceration, against Mace for allegedly violating the court-ordered gag order within hours of its issuance through social media posts, campaign emails, and congressional newsletters.
December 10, 2025 · DispatchJudge issues gag order restricting Nancy Mace and others from speaking about ongoing lawsuits
The Post and Courier reports that Judge Hocker imposed a sua sponte gag order barring Mace and eight other parties from publicly discussing two related civil lawsuits, following her February 2025 House floor speech accusing four men of sexual exploitation.