Part of: Mace vs. the Solicitor: the campaign against the prosecutor in her own cases (2025) · Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Musgrave v. Mace (2:25-cv-01823-RMG) · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
'Recuse themselves': Mace's official press release demands the prosecutor's removal and a state investigation into her
On August 18, 2025, Rep. Nancy Mace issued an official congressional press release headlined 'Solicitor Scarlett Wilson Tipped Off Abuser and Leaked Evidence to Harm Victim,' demanding that the elected Ninth Circuit Solicitor recuse from 'any and all cases related to this victim,' be removed from all domestic-violence prosecutions, and face 'a full and immediate state investigation into Wilson's misconduct.' Wilson responded that prosecutors are 'required by law and ethical rules to provide all relevant information to the defense' and that she would not 'play a part in the circus sideshow.' The allegations on all sides are unproven and contested.

Two months after she first named Solicitor Scarlett Wilson on a national podcast, Rep. Nancy Mace put the attack on official congressional letterhead. On August 18, 2025, the day a video Mace's office described as showing domestic violence involving Sullivan's Island businessman Eric Bowman was released publicly, Mace's office issued a press release whose headline was itself the charge: "Solicitor Scarlett Wilson Tipped Off Abuser and Leaked Evidence to Harm Victim."
The release opened with Mace's recusal demand:
"Solicitor Scarlett Wilson's unethical behavior toward the victim has not gone unnoticed. Wilson and her office should immediately recuse themselves and hand over any and all cases related to this victim to a solicitor who will actually protect victims and prosecute criminals."
Mace's official press release as published on mace.house.gov, August 18, 2025. The release itself.
The charges Mace leveled at the prosecutor
The release listed, as numbered points, what it said Wilson's office had done, each framed as a betrayal of the victim:
"Wilson and her Office refused to watch the video evidence when it was provided.
Wilson and her Office have so far refused to indict Bowman for domestic violence.
Wilson and her Office tipped off Bowman about the existence of the video, without the victim's knowledge or consent …
Wilson and her Office leaked a private statement made by the victim to law enforcement … This is in direct violation of Rule 5 …
Wilson and her Office leaked information about a SLED agent to Bowman; the agent is involved in an open and ongoing investigation at SLED.
Wilson and her Office lied to the attorney representing the victim."
And it closed with a list of demands aimed squarely at the elected prosecutor:
"A full and immediate state investigation into Wilson's misconduct.
Wilson's immediate removal from all domestic violence prosecutions while under review.
Removal of any and all cases related to the victim under Wilson's jurisdiction and reassigned to a solicitor outside of this jurisdiction …"
What the prosecutor said back
Wilson did not litigate the case in the press. In a written statement the same day, she rejected the political framing and gave the legal basis for the very "leak" Mace described, that disclosing evidence to the defense is a prosecutor's duty, not misconduct:
"We are required by law and ethical rules to provide all relevant information to the defense, and we have in this matter."
"We will continue to make decisions based on the facts and evidence before us, not on politics or its surrounding rhetoric. Simply put, we will not play a part in the circus sideshow of misguided protestors."
She also reiterated the division of labor Mace's accusations elided, that SLED, not the Solicitor, runs the investigation:
"SLED has briefed me throughout the investigation, but solicitors do not conduct criminal investigations nor make arrests, which are based on probable cause."
Who was pressuring whom
Stripped to its structure, the press release is a sitting member of Congress, the self-described victim and complaining witness in the matters at issue, using official channels to demand that the elected prosecutor for her own circuit be removed from "any and all cases related to this victim" and investigated by the state. Two months earlier, The Post and Courier reported that Mace's office, asked repeatedly, produced no evidence for the obstruction accusation. Wilson's stated answer to the "leak" was a discovery obligation she said the law and ethics rules required. The pattern, and where it leads, is gathered in Mace vs. the Solicitor.
Eric Bowman is one of the men Mace named in her February 10, 2025 floor speech; he and the others deny her allegations. Solicitor Wilson denies Mace's allegations against her. The matters referenced here are the subject of an active SLED investigation and ongoing civil litigation; no underlying matter has been adjudicated and nothing here is a finding of fact. For background see Scarlett Wilson and People in the Public Record.
Sources & related coverage:
- The press release itself: Congresswoman Nancy Mace Responds To Shocking Domestic Violence Video, mace.house.gov (August 18, 2025).
- SC Daily Gazette, "1 of the men Rep. Mace accused of 'heinous crimes' arrested for domestic violence in unrelated case"
- FITSNews, "Bond Denied For Lowcountry Businessman Amid Explosive Abuse Allegations" (carries Wilson's written response).
- Related: Mace vs. the Solicitor · The June 19 podcast attack · Scarlett Wilson


Read next
June 19, 2025 · Dispatch'The solicitor leaked evidence': Mace accuses the prosecutor in her own cases on a national podcast
On June 19, 2025, on the PBD Podcast, Rep. Nancy Mace named Ninth Judicial Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson, the elected chief prosecutor whose circuit would handle the cases arising from Mace's own allegations, and accused her of leaking evidence, refusing to prosecute rape, and having 'inserted yourself into this investigation and … obstructed the investigation.' Wilson answered that her office was not running the investigation, SLED was, and said 'I have no idea what the Congresswoman is referring to.' The Post and Courier reported that when it asked Mace's office, repeatedly, for evidence of the obstruction claim, none was provided. The underlying allegations are unproven and contested.
July 6, 2026 · DispatchPro Se: Nancy Mace has lost her lawyers again, this time in her own defamation suit against Eric Bowman
On July 6, 2026, Rep. Nancy Mace filed a Motion to Lift Stay in her own defamation case against Eric Bowman, and she filed it pro se, representing herself. On the coversheet she crossed out the entire 'Plaintiff's Attorney' block by hand, wrote 'N/A,' and wrote 'Pro Se.' The motion states she 'is now proceeding pro se in this matter, as reflected in the Notice filed June 30, 2026.' It is the second time in this cluster of cases she has gone without counsel. The three attorneys who filed and briefed the Bowman case for her, local counsel Andrew B. Moorman, Sr. and the two Washington lawyers she brought in pro hac vice, William M. Sullivan, Jr. and Alex G. Anderson, are no longer her counsel of record. A separate notice filed the same day names all three and asks the Clerk of Court to remove them. The complete eight-page motion, and the counsel-withdrawal notice, are reproduced below. Allegations on every side are contested and unproven; Bowman denies Mace's claims and has moved to dismiss, and Mace denies Bowman's.
December 31, 2025 · DispatchA pinned post viewed 20,000+ times: Mace calls South Carolina a 'pedophile paradise' while the gag order is in effect
On December 31, 2025, from her verified @RepNancyMace account, Mace published and pinned a post attacking the South Carolina Attorney General, calling the state a 'pedophile paradise' at a time when a gag order in Berg v. Bryant was in effect. The post reportedly re-shared content from her December 27, 2025 video. A contempt motion filed January 12, 2026 attaches it as Exhibit 9 and notes the post had been viewed more than 20,000 times. Mace disputes the validity of the gag order and its application to her.
December 19, 2025 · DispatchIn her own sworn Answer, Mace admits she 'placed an air tag on Bryant's car for one day in August 2023'
In her December 19, 2025 Answer to Patrick Bryant's Third-Party Complaint, Rep. Nancy Mace admits under oath that she placed a tracking device on Bryant's car and attempted to access his laptop, while denying Bryant's allegation that she intended to weaponize what she found. The filing is Mace's own account, in her own words, on the public court record.
December 1, 2025 · DispatchWhile under the gag order, Mace's congressional office sends a mass newsletter about the case: 'I WILL NOT be silenced.'
On December 1, 2025, while the Berg v. Bryant gag order was in effect, a mass email newsletter from Rep. Nancy Mace's congressional office, headlined 'Rep. Nancy Mace says 2 more women accuse her ex-fiancé of abuse,' named Patrick Bryant, recited unproven allegations, and declared 'I WILL NOT be silenced.' Bryant and Bowman's January 12, 2026 contempt motion attaches the newsletter as Exhibit 8, contending it violated the gag order.
November 28, 2025 · DispatchTwo days into the gag order, Mace posts: 'IMPEACH ALL CORRUPT JUDGES', 'especially including those in South Carolina SPECIFICALLY.'
On November 28, 2025, two days after Judge Hocker entered the sua sponte gag order in Berg v. Bryant, Mace posted from her verified @RepNancyMace account calling to impeach 'all corrupt judges,' adding in the same thread 'especially including those in South Carolina SPECIFICALLY.' Bryant and Bowman's January 12, 2026 contempt motion makes the post Exhibit 4 and contends it violated the gag order.